Okay, I haven't been riding for 20 years, but I've been around. I've bombed around the most badass 10 mile loops in Michigan, down some of the sickest down hills in NC, and up some of the longest road climbs in the U.P. I've ridden aluminum, scandium alloy, carbon fiber, and full suspension bikes. I've tooled around on a couple 29ers, but nothing serious.
As a racer and a bike rider who just likes to go fast in general, I'm always looking for the best way to get a leg up on my speed. So what's my take on 29ers? Well, for the most part I think they're marketing/word of mouth hype, not unlike anything else. I do think there are some advantages, namely sand and soft terrain. You hear all the great reviews, but you hear great reviews every time something new comes out. What you don't hear so often is people who lay down a couple grand on a new bike and say they don't like it. I think there are at least two reasons for this. First, new bikes are just awesome, no matter what. When all your bearings are rolling smooth, your suspension is supple, and your shifting is clean, you feel like you are flying. It's like a breath of fresh air after riding in Warren for six months. Secondly, I think people are too ashamed to admit they spent a crap load of money on something that isn't as good as their old steed, especially when it's that new thing that every one is talking about.
Then what kind of bike do I like? Well, it's one that's light, simple, and has smooth mechanical action (and okay, it has to have front suspension and tubeless tires, two of the greatest mtb inventions of all time). Nothing more, nothing less. After riding various machines over these past seasons, I find that none of them are able to produce faster times at the trails or on the roads in comparison to the others. They all leave me feeling the same after a three hour thrash fest at the trail, hard tail or full suspension, carbon fiber or aluminum. I will not deny that certain bikes perform better in certain circumstances; light bikes climb better, suspension descends better, hard tails accellerate quicker and are faster on the flats. But still, no bike will offer a major advantage in any of the previously listed departments to make it a better, faster ride than the other guy's bike. This is why I don't currently have any plans to purchase a 29er, 69er, 96er or whatever Chris Eatough might be riding next week.
Like I said, I haven't been around for very long, and therefore my opinions could change in the future. I guess I'll find out next season when I build up a new machine.
So having said all that, what does make the difference? No, it's not the carbon fiber, it's not the 400 gram tire, not the size of the wheel, but it is the training. It's that simple. Train harder and you will become faster, no matter what bike you ride.
Please consider this when you are thinking about spending $6500 on a new mountain bike. Don't be mislead by what you read on MMBA or mtbr.
I was going to post the picture of it, but here's a link instead. Remember this?
Elsewhere, training has been going well. I DNS the Stony marathon because I got sick that week. I missed some important training, and therefore thought it would be better to train than to race in preparation for my next race. I am very behind in the state rankings, but I am no longer concerned with that as there has been a major change of plans. Stay tuned for the scoop on that.